 |
| New Orleans Levees In the aftermath of hurricane Katrina, FLI-MAP was contracted by US Army Corps of Engineers to conduct damage assessment surveys on over 400 miles of levees in the vicinity of New Orleans. The survey was conducted over a period of six days |
| | | |

| | Grand Canyon FLI-MAP was selected by the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center to survey sedimentation areas on the base of the Grand Canyon. FLI-MAP was chosen due to its high levels of accuracy and density of data set. This enabled differentiation of ground and vegetation features within the data. |
| | | |
| | Rio Grande Levees FLI-MAP, along with the RESOLVE system, operated by fellow Fugro company, Fugro Airborne Surveys of Canada, was selected to assess the levee systems on the Rio Grande on the Texas/Mexico border. FLI-MAP accurately mapped the surface of the levees, and RESOLVE electromagnetic data was used to assess the sub-surface soil properties. |
| | | |
| | Mid American Energy Transmission Lines FLI-MAP was selected by Mid American Energy to collect LiDAR data and to process the data into a PLS-CADD deliverable, capable of direct use by engineering staff. Mid American takes advantage of the "economy of scale" by planning all their data collection needs for a year, into a single data collection, providing significant cost savings. |
| | | |
| | Norfolk Southern Rail System FLI-MAP was selected by Norfolk Southern to collect data on over 20,000 miles of rail. FLI-MAP was chosen for its proven accuracy and record of similar successful projects for other rail clients. FLI-MAP data was processed by Fugro and is being used by Norfolk Southern for Positive Train Control. |
| | | |
| | I-69 Highway Corridor FLI-MAP was selected by TX DOT to obtain a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) of 42 miles of the proposed I-69 highway corridor in Texas. FLI-MAP's dense data set allowed good ground data to be obtained through fairly dense vegetation, and the speed and efficiency of FLI-MAP allowed for savings of 9 months in time and approximately $1.5 million in costs over conventional methods. |